data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/236f7/236f7d4a32f3d477c06987408d3ff9351194fe07" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86d1a/86d1a9f46d190e54bd30dbf229c7dfcec4e1510b" alt=""
Subject to water pollution and water reduction (siphoning off water to quench the large thirst of agricultural regions in California), in addition to reduced food sources from a warmer Pacific and less robust breeding with wild versus hatchery raised salmon - all have impacted the population which is expected to increase slightly in the fall but still be far below the council's recommended minimum goal of 122,000.
Approximately 2,200 fisherman have been put out of work and received federal disaster aid because of the ban but, perhaps surprisingly, many support the ban as the only way to insure the long-term future of the salmon population. Their primary concern is California water policy that seems to be favoring agriculture at the expense of critical salmon spawning grounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment